Right to Repair: A Shift Toward Sustainable Consumerism

---

Introduction: From Throwaway Culture to a Repair-First Future

Across Europe, a quiet revolution is underway. For decades, consumer electronics, appliances, and even vehicles have been optimized for sleekness, low upfront cost, and rapid replacement rather than long-term durability or repair. Devices were glued shut, spare parts were proprietary, and independent repairers were locked out through software or contractual barriers. The result has been a throwaway culture that is environmentally destructive, economically wasteful, and disempowering for consumers.

The Right to Repair movement – now being codified into law across the European Union – aims to flip that script. New EU regulations are reshaping how products are designed, sold, and supported, so that repair becomes the default choice rather than an afterthought. This legal and cultural shift is nudging manufacturers to provide spare parts, accessible repair information, and longer product lifetimes, while rewarding consumers who choose repair over replacement with extended legal guarantees and greater transparency.¹³⁵

This article explores:

• The historical evolution of Right to Repair, from grassroots activism to EU-level law.
• The current regulatory landscape and its real-world impacts on design, business models, and consumer behavior.
• Practical applications and case studies illustrating how repair is becoming embedded in mainstream practice.
• The future implications for technology, circular economy strategies, and global regulation.

Written in an analytical yet accessible tone, this piece is aimed at professionals, policymakers, designers, and researchers interested in sustainability, product design, and consumer rights. It argues that as Right to Repair becomes a legal requirement and cultural norm, it will fundamentally reshape how we conceive of ownership, responsibility, and value in a resource-constrained world.

---

1. Historical Context: How Right to Repair Emerged and Evolved

1.1 From Durable Goods to Planned Obsolescence

In the mid‑20th century, household appliances and machinery were often designed for decades of service. Products were:

• Mechanically simple.
• Assembled with screws and bolts instead of glues.
• Sold with paper manuals including schematics and maintenance instructions.
• Supported by local repair shops and skilled trades.

Over time, several trends eroded this repair-friendly landscape:

1. Consumerism and rapid product cycles
   The post‑war boom fueled demand for novel designs and quick model turnovers. Marketing emphasized “newness” rather than longevity.
2. Planned and perceived obsolescence
   Products were increasingly designed with shorter functional lifespans or with styling that quickly looked outdated, incentivizing replacement rather than repair.
3. Digitalization and complexity
   The integration of electronics, microcontrollers, and later software into everyday goods made diagnosis and repair more complex, often requiring specialized tools and knowledge.
4. Globalized supply chains and cost pressures
   To keep retail prices low, manufacturers optimized for assembly efficiency and material reduction, sometimes resulting in glued assemblies and modular designs that were not intended to be disassembled outside factory environments.

By the late 1990s and early 2000s, many consumers had come to see products – especially electronics – as disposable, with repair seen as slow, costly, or simply unavailable.

1.2 The Roots of the Right to Repair Movement

The modern Right to Repair movement grew from several overlapping communities:

• Independent repair technicians who saw their livelihoods threatened by proprietary tools, parts restrictions, and anti-repair design.
• Environmental NGOs concerned with rising e‑waste and resource depletion.
• Digital rights and free software advocates who linked device repair to broader questions of software freedom, ownership, and control.
• Consumer rights organizations addressing unfair terms and opaque warranties.

Key early milestones included:

• Automotive Right to Repair in the United States: Campaigns in the 2000s pushed automakers to provide independent garages with access to diagnostic data and tools. Massachusetts’ 2012 automotive right to repair law became a reference model for later efforts elsewhere.
• Online repair communities and documentation platforms (e.g., iFixit) that democratized knowledge through tear-downs, repair guides, and parts marketplaces.
• Emergence of “repair cafés” and community workshops, especially in Europe, where citizens could fix items together, blending sustainability, skill-sharing, and social activity.

These activities reframed repair as both a practical necessity and a cultural act of resistance against wasteful, opaque, and monopolistic practices.

1.3 EU Environmental and Consumer Law as a Foundation

While the term “Right to Repair” is relatively recent, EU policy had been laying the groundwork for decades through:

• The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive, which placed responsibility on producers to manage end-of-life products and encouraged design for recyclability.
• The Eco-design Directive, which set energy efficiency and, more recently, reparability and durability requirements for certain product categories.
• The Consumer Sales and Guarantees Directive, which defined conformity and remedies such as repair, replacement, or refund for defective goods.

Initially, these frameworks focused mainly on energy consumption and end-of-life waste management. Over time, policymakers recognized that upstream product design and mid-life repairability were critical leverage points for achieving circular economy goals.

1.4 From Eco-design Tweaks to Systemic Right to Repair

The decisive shift came when the EU began to explicitly integrate repairability into product policy:

• For some appliances (e.g., washing machines, dishwashers, refrigeration), Eco-design regulations began to require:
  • Availability of spare parts for a minimum number of years.
  • Access to repair information for professional repairers.
  • Design features enabling disassembly without damaging the product.

These early rules were limited in scope and largely technical, but set an important precedent: repairability was a legitimate and enforceable regulatory objective.

At the same time, citizens and NGOs increasingly pushed for broader, consumer-facing rights: the ability for any consumer to request repair as a standard remedy, ensure affordable access to spare parts, and choose repairers freely, not just manufacturer-authorized networks.

This pressure culminated in comprehensive EU initiatives such as the Circular Economy Action Plan and the New Consumer Agenda, which explicitly referenced Right to Repair as a strategic element in achieving environmental and consumer protection goals.¹³⁵

---

2. Current Relevance: The EU Right to Repair Framework Today

2.1 The New EU Directive on the Repair of Goods

In 2024, the EU adopted the Right to Repair Directive ((EU) 2024/1799), a landmark piece of legislation that significantly strengthens consumer repair rights across member states.⁵ This directive amends existing consumer law and introduces new obligations for manufacturers and sellers, with several core pillars:

1. Repair as a preferred remedy
   When a product is defective and still within the legal guarantee period, consumers must be actively encouraged to choose repair over replacement if it is cheaper or equal in cost for the seller. This shifts default behavior from “replace” to “repair.”¹³
2. Extended guarantee for repaired products
   If a consumer opts for repair under the legal guarantee instead of replacement, they receive an additional 12‑month extension of the legal guarantee, increasing their sense of security and making repair more attractive.¹³
3. Obligation to repair beyond the legal guarantee for certain products
   For specific product groups already covered by EU repairability requirements (for example, household appliances under Eco-design rules), manufacturers must offer repair services beyond the legal guarantee period, extending the practical lifetime of these goods.¹⁴
4. Standardized European Repair Information Form
   Before consumers commit to repair, service providers must be able to issue a standard form with clear information on:
   • Price or method of calculating price.
   • Time needed for repair.
   • Availability of temporary replacement devices, where applicable. This transparency helps consumers compare options and avoid surprise costs.¹³
5. Right to access spare parts at reasonable prices
   Manufacturers must ensure the availability of spare parts (and often repair information) at reasonable prices, addressing a common barrier where spare parts cost nearly as much as a replacement product.²⁴

Together, these measures aim to re-balance incentives: making repair economically rational, legally secure, and practically feasible for consumers.

2.2 Spare Parts, Repair Portals, and Market Infrastructure

The directive is not operating in a vacuum; it interacts with and builds upon Eco-design and other sector‑specific regulations that already require:

• Minimum availability periods for spare parts (e.g., up to 7–10 years after the last unit is placed on the market for some appliances).
• Maximum delivery times for parts (often capped at 10–15 working days).
• Access to repair and maintenance information, at least for professional repairers, via online portals.²⁴

From July 2026 onward, the obligation to provide spare parts at reasonable prices will apply for products covered by EU repairability regulations, closing the gap where manufacturers formally offered parts but priced them so high that repair became irrational.²

Many manufacturers have responded by:

• Launching dedicated repair portals or sections on their websites where:
  • Consumers can order spare parts directly.
  • Tutorials or manuals are available in multiple languages.
  • Authorized and independent repairers can access technical documents and software updates.
• Working with logistics partners to optimize parts distribution, ensuring quicker lead times and more predictable availability.

This infrastructure is crucial for making Right to Repair not just a legal concept, but a practical, everyday reality.

2.3 Environmental and Economic Drivers: Why It Matters Now

The urgency behind these policy changes is grounded in stark data:

• The EU generates millions of tonnes of e‑waste each year, making electronic waste one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally.⁴
• Manufacturing new products is resource-intensive, consuming critical raw materials (such as rare earth elements) and producing significant greenhouse gas emissions.
• Studies consistently show that extending product lifetimes is one of the most effective strategies for reducing environmental impacts across the lifecycle, often more impactful than marginal efficiency improvements.

On the economic side:

• Consumers lose money when products fail prematurely or are designed in ways that make repair economically irrational.
• Right to Repair can stimulate local economies by creating and sustaining repair jobs, from independent workshops to in-house service centers and logistics roles.
• SMEs can benefit from more open access to parts and information, leading to new business models such as subscription maintenance, refurbishment, and parts remanufacturing.

Policymakers increasingly frame Right to Repair as a win-win strategy: supporting consumer welfare, environmental targets, and local employment in one coherent policy package.¹³⁴

2.4 Emerging Trends and Current Challenges

Despite this progress, several challenges remain:

1. Scope limitations
   Current EU rules focus on specific product categories (e.g., household appliances, some electronics). Many categories – such as certain consumer electronics, power tools, or specialized equipment – are only gradually being brought under repairability frameworks.
2. Software locks and digital barriers
   Even when hardware is repairable, software restrictions can block functions after repair, especially if only authorized parts or repairers are recognized. Firmware pairing and secure boot systems can hinder independent repair unless explicitly addressed by regulation.
3. Consumer awareness and habits
   Legal rights do not automatically translate into behavior change. Many consumers are still more familiar with replacement options than with repair pathways, and may underestimate the quality and convenience of modern repair services.
4. Cost perceptions
   Even with “reasonable” spare part prices, labor costs and logistics can make repair appear expensive relative to low-cost imports. Policies such as reduced VAT on repair services (used in some countries) can help, but adoption is uneven.
5. Enforcement and harmonization
   The EU sets common rules, but implementation and enforcement are largely national responsibilities. Ensuring that all member states enforce obligations – especially on spare parts pricing and information access – is an ongoing challenge.⁴⁵

Current relevance, therefore, lies not only in the content of the laws but also in the transition dynamics: how quickly manufacturers, retailers, and consumers adapt, and how consistently national authorities enforce the new standards.

---

3. Practical Applications: How Right to Repair Is Changing the Real World

3.1 Case Study: Home Appliances and Longevity by Design

Home appliances – from washing machines and dishwashers to refrigerators – are among the first major beneficiaries of EU repairability rules.

Design Shifts

Manufacturers are redesigning appliances to:

• Use modular assemblies that can be removed and replaced without damaging the product.
• Minimize the use of permanent adhesives in structural joints, instead using screws and clips.
• Provide easy access panels for key components like pumps, motors, and electronics.

Some brands now advertise:

• The number of years spare parts will be available.
• The presence of “repair-friendly” features, such as detachable panels, screw-based assembly, and error-code diagnostics.

Service Ecosystems

The new EU directive’s obligation to repair beyond the legal guarantee for certain appliances is pushing manufacturers to:

• Expand networks of authorized service centers.
• Collaborate with independent repairers by giving them access to parts and repair instructions, sometimes under fair licensing conditions.
• Offer flat-fee repair packages for common faults, giving consumers price certainty.

This case shows how legal obligations directly shape product architecture and aftersales strategies, embedding repair as a standard phase in the product lifecycle.

3.2 Case Study: Consumer Electronics and Modular Design

While consumer electronics (like smartphones, tablets, and laptops) lag behind appliances in regulatory coverage, Right to Repair has spurred pioneering products and business models:

• Modular smartphones and laptops: A small but growing set of manufacturers design devices where:
  • Batteries, displays, cameras, and ports can be replaced with minimal tools.
  • Parts are sold directly to consumers and independent shops.
  • Repair tutorials are open and detailed.
• Transparent repair score labels: Some countries and brands experiment with labels rating:
  • Ease of disassembly.
  • Availability and price of spare parts.
  • Availability of repair documentation. These scores empower consumers to choose more repairable products, pressuring competitors to follow.

Although not all of these initiatives are mandated by EU law, they are aligned with the Right to Repair narrative and increasingly seen as precursors to wider regulation.

3.3 Case Study: Repair Portals and Digital Infrastructure

Right to Repair is not only about physical design; it is also about information infrastructure.

Manufacturer Portals

In response to regulatory requirements and market expectations, many manufacturers have launched online repair portals where:

• Consumers can search for spare parts using product codes or serial numbers.
• Manuals, schematics, and FAQs are provided, at least for professional repairers and often for consumers.
• Diagnostic tools or update utilities can be downloaded, sometimes with controlled access.

This infrastructure lowers the transaction cost of repair:

• It reduces the time needed to identify the correct part.
• It simplifies the ordering process.
• It builds trust that parts are genuine and supported.

Third-Party Platforms

Parallel to manufacturer portals, independent platforms aggregate:

• Spare parts from multiple brands.
• Repair guides and videos.
• Ratings and reviews of parts and tools.

Such platforms help democratize repair knowledge and support small repair businesses that cannot maintain separate relationships with every manufacturer.

3.4 Case Study: National Policy Experiments – Repair Bonuses and Reduced VAT

Several EU member states have experimented with economic incentives that complement Right to Repair regulations:

• Repair bonuses: Some countries introduced schemes where consumers receive a subsidy or voucher to cover part of the cost of repairing appliances, electronics, or other goods. This:
  • Directly addresses cost perceptions.
  • Stimulates demand for local repair services.
• Reduced VAT rates for repair: Lower tax rates on repair services and refurbished goods make them more price-competitive relative to new products.

These national initiatives demonstrate how fiscal policy can reinforce legal rights, creating a multi-layered ecosystem where repair becomes economically attractive, not just legally possible.

3.5 Corporate Strategy: From Product Sales to Lifecycle Services

Facing stricter repair obligations and shifting consumer expectations, some companies are rethinking their business models toward lifecycle services:

• Product-as-a-service: Instead of selling devices outright, providers lease them and remain responsible for maintenance and repair. This naturally aligns with durability and repairability, since the provider bears the cost of failures.
• Trade-in and refurbishment programs: Manufacturers and retailers collect used products, refurbish them, and resell them with warranties. Right to Repair rules support these models by ensuring access to parts and reducing legal uncertainties around repaired goods.
• Predictive maintenance: For connected devices, sensor data can be used to predict failures and plan repairs proactively, minimizing downtime and extending lifetimes.

In this context, Right to Repair is not merely a compliance issue; it becomes a strategic lever in building circular, service-oriented value propositions.

---

4. Future Implications: Where Right to Repair Is Heading

4.1 Deepening Legal Rights: From Hardware to Software

One of the most critical frontiers is software-enabled control over hardware:

• Many devices now require software activation of components after replacement.
• Firmware may refuse to recognize non-authorized parts, or lock functionality if tampering is detected.
• Remote updates can change device capabilities long after purchase.

Experts and advocacy groups argue that meaningful Right to Repair must include digital aspects, such as:

• Prohibiting unnecessary software locks that serve primarily to restrict competition.
• Requiring access to diagnostic software and calibration tools for independent repairers.
• Clarifying consumer rights around security updates, feature continuity, and data access when devices are repaired or refurbished.

As the EU advances related initiatives (e.g., the Digital Fairness agenda, Data Act, and cybersecurity regulations), there is likely to be greater integration between digital and repair rights, embedding a more holistic notion of product stewardship.

4.2 Expanding Scope to New Product Categories

Current EU Right to Repair rules focus on a defined set of product groups, primarily in household appliances and some electronics. Future expansions may include:

• Information and communication technology (ICT) more broadly, including:
  • Smartphones and tablets.
  • Laptops and desktop computers.
  • Network equipment and peripherals.
• Professional and industrial equipment, where downtime costs are high and repairability can yield large environmental and economic benefits.
• Mobility devices, such as e‑bikes, scooters, and components of electric vehicles, where battery and electronic repair are crucial for sustainability.

Experts expect that as data accumulate on the positive environmental and economic impacts of existing rules – such as reduced e‑waste and cost savings – political support for widening the scope will increase.⁴⁵

4.3 Design Paradigms: Circular, Modular, and Serviceable by Default

In the medium term, Right to Repair is likely to drive a paradigm shift in product design:

1. Modularity and standardization
   • Components will be more interchangeable.
   • Interfaces and fasteners will be standardized across models and even brands where feasible.
   • Modules will have documented lifetimes and replacement procedures, making planning and inventory management easier.
2. Lifecycle-oriented engineering
   • Design teams will consider not only production cost and aesthetics, but also:
     • Frequency of common failures.
     • Ease and time required for repair.
     • Environmental impact of different repair strategies (e.g., replacing a module versus repairing at component level).
3. Digital twins and documentation
   • Products may be delivered with digital twins or comprehensive service documentation accessible by QR code, enabling:
     • Real-time tracking of component status.
     • Guided repair procedures via augmented reality or mobile apps.
   • This can make consumer self-repair more feasible and safe, reducing dependence on proprietary service networks.

Such shifts will require upskilling of engineers and industrial designers with repairability and circularity competencies, likely influencing engineering education and professional standards.

4.4 Economic and Social Implications: Local Repair Ecosystems and Skills

As repair becomes the default expectation, several broader transformations are likely:

• Growth of local repair ecosystems
  Cities and regions may see the expansion of:
  • Independent repair shops.
  • Refurbishment centers.
  • Community repair spaces (repair cafés, makerspaces).
• New skills and professions
  Demand will grow for:
  • Multi-brand, multi-domain repair technicians.
  • Logistics professionals specializing in reverse flows (collecting, triaging, redistributing parts and products).
  • Designers and engineers skilled in circular design methodologies.
• Cultural revaluation of maintenance and care
  Repair and maintenance, often undervalued compared to innovation and “newness,” may gain new status as key contributors to:
  • Climate and resource resilience.
  • Economic autonomy.
  • Community cohesion.

In this way, Right to Repair is not only about legal provisions; it is part of a cultural shift toward valuing care, stewardship, and interdependence.

4.5 Potential Risks and Tensions

While the trajectory is promising, several tensions must be managed carefully:

1. Security and safety vs. openness
   • Manufacturers argue that some software locks and restrictions are necessary for:
     • Cybersecurity.
     • Safety-critical functions (e.g., in medical devices, vehicles).
   • Policymakers must balance these concerns with the need to avoid using “security” as a blanket justification for anti-competitive or anti-repair practices.
2. Quality assurance in a more open repair ecosystem
   • Poor-quality repairs can damage brand reputation and cause safety issues.
   • One response could be certification frameworks or quality standards for independent repairers, allowing openness while maintaining safety baselines.
3. Global supply chains and regulatory fragmentation
   • Manufacturers serving global markets face a patchwork of regulations:
     • The EU Right to Repair Directive.
     • National or state-level right to repair laws elsewhere in the world.
   • While this can complicate compliance, it may also create momentum for international best practices and standards that reduce complexity over time.
4. Rebound effects and consumption patterns
   • If repair becomes cheap and easy, some fear that consumers might buy more products overall (e.g., multiple devices), potentially offsetting some environmental gains.
   • The net effect will depend on broader consumption patterns, pricing strategies, and cultural shifts around sufficiency and minimalism.

Understanding and navigating these tensions will require ongoing research, stakeholder dialogue, and adaptive regulation.

---

5. Expert Views and Ongoing Research

Researchers, NGOs, and international organizations are actively studying the impacts of Right to Repair policies. Emerging themes include:

• Quantifying environmental benefits
  Lifecycle assessment (LCA) studies compare scenarios with:
  • Short-lived, non-repairable products.
  • Long-lived, repairable products with multiple lifecycles (including refurbishment and second-hand markets).
    Early work suggests substantial reductions in carbon emissions and resource use when lifetimes are extended meaningfully.
• Behavioral economics of repair decisions
  Studies explore how price signals, information clarity, and hassle factors influence consumer choices between repair and replacement. Policy tools such as:
  • Extended guarantees.
  • Transparent repair cost estimates.
  • Fiscal incentives (e.g., VAT reductions)
    are examined for their effectiveness in changing behavior patterns.
• Innovation incentives
  There is a debate on whether Right to Repair dampens or enhances innovation. Some fear that strict repairability requirements might limit design freedom; others argue that such constraints stimulate creative engineering solutions and new business models.
• Global diffusion of policy
  Scholars track how EU Right to Repair rules influence laws in other regions, creating policy diffusion effects. Already, various jurisdictions are referencing EU rules when drafting their own regulations, and global industry groups monitor EU developments closely.⁴⁵

Experts generally converge on the view that Right to Repair is necessary but not sufficient. It must be part of a broader circular economy strategy that includes:

• Product-as-a-service models.
• High-quality recycling for end-of-life products.
• Sustainable material sourcing.
• Cultural shifts in consumption norms.

---

6. Conclusion: Repair as the New Normal

The transformation now unfolding in the EU is profound: repair is being reframed from a niche, often difficult option into a mainstream, legally protected default. Through the Right to Repair Directive and related policies, the EU is:

• Making repair economically attractive via extended guarantees and requirements for reasonable spare parts pricing.¹²³
• Making repair practically feasible by mandating spare parts availability, repair information access, and repair portals for key product categories.¹²⁴
• Signaling to manufacturers that product design must internalize repairability, durability, and circularity, not as optional extras but as core requirements.⁵

Historically, this shift emerges from decades of environmental policy, consumer protection law, and grassroots activism. Today, it responds to pressing environmental, economic, and social needs: reducing waste, conserving resources, saving consumers money, and creating skilled local jobs.

Looking ahead, Right to Repair will likely:

• Expand to more product categories and integrate more deeply with digital rights and cybersecurity frameworks.
• Accelerate the adoption of modular, serviceable design paradigms and circular business models.
• Nourish local and regional repair ecosystems, reviving skills and valuing maintenance as a central societal function.

At the same time, policymakers, industry, and civil society must navigate complex trade-offs around safety, security, innovation, and global supply chain coordination. Effective enforcement and continuous learning will be essential.

For researchers and practitioners, several key areas for future work stand out:

1. Robust measurement of environmental and socio-economic impacts of Right to Repair policies across different product categories.
2. Design methodologies and standards that seamlessly integrate repairability, modularity, and circularity into mainstream engineering practice.
3. Behavioral and cultural research on how to embed repair into everyday consumer habits, making it not just possible, but natural and valued.

As legal frameworks mature and market practices align, we move closer to a world where buying a product means entering into a long-term relationship with it – supported by the right to repair, the infrastructure to make repair easy, and a culture that sees care and maintenance as powerful acts of sustainability.

---